Back

Search results

Found 3726 results. Displaying page 188 of 249

  1. 7 July 2005

    Braemar Lodge 2004 Limited

    Braemar Lodge 2004 Limited offered participatory securities for subscription in conjunction with individual unit titles under the Unit Titles Act 1972 without a registered prospectus, investment statement or deed of participation. Braemar and the directors(Neil Gurdjieff Dougan, Ernest Ross Thomson) were, at the time of the offer, unaware that the offers had been made in contravention of the Securities Act 1978. Read more.
    Tags
    Enforceable undertaking, Powers, Enforcement
    Type
    Page

  2. 5 March 2013

    Nathans Finance NZ Ltd

    The Commission alleged that statements concerning Nathans' lending to related parties, the quality of its loan book, its loan management practices and its management of liquidity were untrue. It is also alleged that the directors made untrue statements in a prospectus extension certificate in March 2007. Read more.
    Tags
    Court – criminal, Powers, Enforcement
    Type
    Page

  3. 21 February 2005

    South Pacific Energy Limited and Calgary Petroleum

    South Pacific and Calgary offered undertakings to the Securities Commission after Commissions concern that they may have offered securities to the public in contravention of the Securities Act. The undertakings will ensure that no such breaches occur in the future. Read more.
    Tags
    Enforceable undertaking, Powers, Enforcement
    Type
    Page

  4. 4 July 2005

    Monaco Village Holdings Limited

    This undertaking is offered to the Securities Commission for acceptance under section 69J of the Securities Act 1978 by Monaco Village Holdings Limited and its directors (Robert Michael Gepp and Roderick Hugh Duke) after unintentional contravention of Securities Act 1978 and Securities Regulations 1983. Read more.
    Tags
    Enforceable undertaking, Powers, Enforcement
    Type
    Page

  5. 8 June 2006

    The Gables Limited (TGL), Combined Financial Services Limited (CFS) and Aoraki Commerical Property Limited (ACP)

    The Securities Commission formed the view that the offer made by TGL and the advertisement of the offer by CFS and ACP in 2006 did not comply with section 33(1) of the Act in that it was not made in or accompanied by an investment statement that complied with the Act and the Securities Regulations 1983, nor was it made in an authorised advertisement, nor in or accompanied by a registered prospectus that complied with the Act and Regulations. Read more.
    Tags
    Enforceable undertaking, Powers, Enforcement
    Type
    Page

  6. 20 June 2007

    Contributory Mortgage Investments Limited

    The Commission considered that CMI, CMN, Mr Martin and Mr van Nieuwkoop have failed to meet the standards of care and good governance that it expects from those who seek to raise funds from the public. Enforceable undertakings were offered to remedy the issues. Read more.
    Tags
    Investigations, Enforceable undertaking, Powers, Enforcement
    Type
    Page

  7. 13 December 2011

    Kiwi Finance Limited

    This undertaking by Kiwi Finance directors(Rhys Anthony Greensill, Rodney Seymour Roberts Greensill, Barry Noel Lambert and Christopher Bruce Simkin) was accepted by FMA to conclude its civil claim investigations after Kiwi Finance went into receivership in April 2008. It resulted in full restitution of investors' funds, together with an enforceable undertaking from the Directors. Read more.
    Tags
    Enforceable undertaking, Powers, Enforcement
    Type
    Page

  8. 21 December 2011

    VonWin Capital Management, L.P.

    FMA asked VonWin for an enforceable undertaking and to include a statement provided by FMA at the beginning of any offer they send to Irongate bondholders to ensure they make an informed decision. Read more.
    Tags
    Enforceable undertaking, Powers, Enforcement
    Type
    Page

  9. 24 April 2012

    Sean Wood

    Sean Wood appealed against a Financial Markets Authority decision to decline his application for authorisation as an Authorised Financial Adviser (AFA). Read more.
    Tags
    Powers, Licence cancellation, Enforcement
    Type
    Page

  10. 15 October 2013

    FMP Medical Services Limited

    Financial Markets Authority made orders under section 43G{l}(c} and section 43F(l}(a} of the Securities Act 1978, cancelling registration of the registered combined prospectus and investment statement for an issue of equity securities of FMP Medical Services Limited and prohibiting the distribution of the Offer Document. Read more.
    Tags
    Stop Order, Powers, Enforcement
    Type
    Page

  11. 3 October 1994

    Power New Zealand Limited

    The decision of the Securities Commission in respect of an appeal under Section 69 Securities Act 1978 by Power New Zealand Limited against a decision of the Registrar to refuse registration of the prospectus. Read more
    Tags
    Enforceable undertaking, Powers, Enforcement
    Type
    Page

  12. 13 July 2012

    Robert Ross and Ross Investments (Aust) Pty Limited

    Ross Investments (Aust) Pty Limited and Robert Ross entered into an enforceable undertaking to include FMA statement in unsolicited offer documents made before 1 December 2012. Read more.
    Tags
    Enforceable undertaking, Powers, Enforcement
    Type
    Page

  13. 27 November 2023

    Medical Assurance Society New Zealand Limited (MAS)

    Details of the case filed in the High Court against Medical Assurance Society New Zealand Limited (MAS) can be found on this page.
    Tags
    Fair dealing, Enforceable undertaking, Powers, Court – civil, Business, Enforcement
    Type
    Page

  14. 11 October 2023

    Kiwibank

    The FMA filed High Court civil proceedings against Kiwibank for making false and/or misleading representations, under the fair dealing provisions of the Financial Markets Conduct Act (FMC Act). Read the case timeline on this page.
    Tags
    Cases, Court – civil, Powers, Enforcement
    Type
    Page

  15. 7 March 2024

    Tower Limited

    FMA filed civil proceedings against Tower Limited (Tower) for failing to apply multi policy discounts to eligible customers’ premiums, resulting in approximately $9.5 million* in overcharges. This page details out the background of the case and any associated communications resulting from the case.
    Tags
    Cases, Court – civil, Powers, Enforcement
    Type
    Page